Well, nothing like running the risk of being eliminated to make me use quickly my faves, the ones I REALLY chose Van Hoogstraten for, and that I hoped I could show. This is the one I was talking about as being an even better version of a similar concept, when I used that view of a corridor with the dog, the parrot, the cat, etc.
In this one, Van Hoogstraten doesn't even need living creatures to create a mystery and tell a (possible, only possible) story.
The slippers left somewhere in the middle of a corridor. An open door with the keys still in it. A candle without a flame...
May this be telling the story of an infidelity? The broom and slippers, symbol of domesticity, are abandoned, and someone has left the keys to a door in said door, to allow someone to enter. The candle has been blown (the fire "taken"?). Make of it what you will! Perhaps it may just be telling the story of a housewife doing home chores and something has interrupted her and she's just going to see who knowcked at the door, lol. But the air of playful mystery in the painting is inescapable, so there has to be more...
But it is also Van Hogstraten showing off his talent for perspective, and his theory about fooling the eye. The painting-within-a-painting at the end of the corridor is saying "I could make it ad infinitum, this painting is just another frame towards another world that could have another endless perspective in it, and have another painting-within-a-painting at the end of it..." A supremely baroque, supremely playful masterpiece.